Using a household-structured branching process to analyse contact tracing in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Author:

Fyles Martyn12ORCID,Fearon Elizabeth34ORCID,Overton Christopher1ORCID,Wingfield Tom567ORCID,Medley Graham F.34ORCID,Hall Ian1289ORCID,Pellis Lorenzo129ORCID,House Thomas12910ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PY, UK

2. The Alan Turing Institute, London NW1 2DB, UK

3. Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK

4. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK

5. Department of Clinical Sciences and International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK

6. Tropical and Infectious Disease Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK

7. WHO Collaborating Centre on Tuberculosis and Social Medicine, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

8. Public Health England, UK

9. Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, , Daresbury WA4 4AD, UK

10. IBM Research, Hartree Centre, Daresbury WA4 4AD, UK

Abstract

We explore strategies of contact tracing, case isolation and quarantine of exposed contacts to control the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic using a branching process model with household structure. This structure reflects higher transmission risks among household members than among non-household members. We explore strategic implementation choices that make use of household structure, and investigate strategies including two-step tracing, backwards tracing, smartphone tracing and tracing upon symptom report rather than test results. The primary model outcome is the effect of contact tracing, in combination with different levels of physical distancing, on the growth rate of the epidemic. Furthermore, we investigate epidemic extinction times to indicate the time period over which interventions must be sustained. We consider effects of non-uptake of isolation/quarantine, non-adherence, and declining recall of contacts over time. Our results find that, compared to self-isolation of cases without contact tracing, a contact tracing strategy designed to take advantage of household structure allows for some relaxation of physical distancing measures but cannot completely control the epidemic absent of other measures. Even assuming no imported cases and sustainment of moderate physical distancing, testing and tracing efforts, the time to bring the epidemic to extinction could be in the order of months to years. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK’.

Funder

Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Wellcome Trust

Academy of Medical Sciences

UK Research and Innovation

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Alan Turing Institute

Royal Society

National Institute for Health Research

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd

Swedish Health Research Council

Medical Research Council

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference69 articles.

1. Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK

2. Income security during public health emergencies: the COVID-19 poverty trap in Vietnam

3. UK Government. Guidance for contacts of people with confirmed coronavirus (COVID-19) infection who do not live with the person . https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-for-contacts-of-people-with-possible-or-confirmed-coronavirus-covid-19-infection-who-do-not-live-with-the-person/guidance-for-contacts-of-people-with-possible-or-confirmed-coronavirus-covid-19-infection-who-do-not-live-with-the-person.

4. Household structure and infectious disease transmission

5. Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3