Author:
Li Wan-ying,Guo Zhen,Li Juan,Han Ji-chang
Abstract
AbstractThe sandy soil leaks water and fertilizer, and the ecological degradation is serious. The structural characteristics of soft rock and sandy soil are complementary, and the improvement of sandy soil by adding soft rock is of great significance to improve soil fertility, restore biodiversity, and maintain sustainable development of the Mu Us sandy land region. In this study, total organic carbon (TOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), easily oxidized organic carbon (ROC), microbial biomass carbon (SMBC), bacterial community structure and crop yield were examined using soft rock:sand volume ratios of 0:1 (CK), 1:5 (C1), 1:2 (C2) and 1:1 (C3). Our results indicated that, compared with the CK treatment, TOC (9.66–22.34%), POC (85.65–120.41%) and ROC (114.12–192.31%) noticeably increased in C1, C2 and C3 treatments; SMBC in treatment C3 increased by 42.77%. The three dominant bacteria in the soil (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi), as well as Proteobacteria abundance, greatly declined in the treatments with the addition of soft rock. Pseudarthrobacter was the dominant Genus in all treatments, having an abundance between 11.83 and 19.33%. Bacterial diversity, richness and evenness indices all recorded an increase under the treatments. POC, TOC and SMBC recorded the most significant effects on the bacterial community structure. The largest increases in wheat and corn yields were recorded in the C2 treatment (16.05% and 16.30%), followed by the C1 treatment (8.28% and 8.20%, respectively). Our findings indicate that a soft rock:sand ratio between 1:5 and 1:2 recorded the most improvement in the sandy soil environment.
Funder
Fund Project of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation
The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University, CHD
Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group internal research project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Vityakon, P. Degradation and restoration of sandy soils under different agricultural land uses in northeast Thailand: A review. Land Degrad. Dev. 18, 567–577 (2007).
2. Houyou, Z, Bielders, C. L., Benhorma, H. A., Dellal, A. & Boutemdjet, A. Evidence of strong land degradation by wind erosion as a result of rainfed cropping in the Algerian Steppe: A case study at Laghouat. Land Degrad. Dev. 27, 1788–1796 (2014).
3. Lv, Z. P., Lu, X. S. & Xin, X. P. The status and trends of grassland desertification in northern China. Acta Agrestia Sin. 13, 24–27 (2005).
4. Xiu, L., Yan, C., Li, X., Qian, D. & Feng, K. Monitoring the response of vegetation dynamics to ecological engineering in the Mu Us Sandy Land of China from 1982 to 2014. Environ. Monit. Assess. 190, 1–18 (2018).
5. Zhang, Z. & Huisingh, D. Combating desertification in China: Monitoring, control, management and revegetation. J. Clean Prod. 182, 765–775 (2018).