Author:
Finnegan S. P.,Svoboda N. J.,Fowler N. L.,Schooler S. L.,Belant J. L.
Abstract
AbstractWithin optimality theory, an animal’s home range can be considered a fitness-driven attempt to obtain resources for survival and reproduction while minimizing costs. We assessed whether brown bears (Ursus arctos) in two island populations maximized resource patches within home ranges (Resource Dispersion Hypothesis [RDH]) or occupied only areas necessary to meet their biological requirements (Temporal Resource Variability Hypothesis [TRVH]) at annual and seasonal scales. We further examined how intrinsic factors (age, reproductive status) affected optimal choices. We found dynamic patterns of space use between populations, with support for RDH and TRVH at both scales. The RDH was likely supported seasonally as a result of bears maximizing space use to obtain a mix of nutritional resources for weight gain. Annually, support for RDH likely reflected changing abundances and distributions of foods within different timber stand classes. TRVH was supported at both scales, with bears minimizing space use when food resources were temporally concentrated. Range sizes and optimal strategies varied among sex and reproductive classes, with males occupying larger ranges, supporting mate seeking behavior and increased metabolic demands of larger body sizes. This work emphasizes the importance of scale when examining animal movement ecology, as optimal behavioral decisions are scale dependent.
Funder
Pittman-Robertson
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Kodiak Brown Bear Trust
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Camp Fire Conservation Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference88 articles.
1. Mitchell, M. S. & Powell, R. A. A mechanistic home range model for optimal use of spatially distributed resources. Ecol. Model. 177, 209–232 (2004).
2. Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O. & Rachlow, J. L. A synoptic model of animal space use: Simultaneous estimation of home range, habitat selection, and inter/intra–specific relationships. Ecol. Model. 214, 338–348 (2008).
3. Nathan, R. An emerging movement ecology paradigm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19050–19051 (2008).
4. Fretwell, S. D. & Lucas, H. L. J. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Part 1. Theoretical development. Acta. Biotheor. 19, 16–36 (1969).
5. Powell, R. A. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. Res. Tech. Animal Ecol. Controversies Consequences. 1, 476 (2000).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献