Author:
McCoy Dakota E.,Shultz Allison J.,Vidoudez Charles,van der Heide Emma,Dall Jacqueline E.,Trauger Sunia A.,Haig David
Abstract
AbstractBrilliantly-colored birds are a model system for research into evolution and sexual selection. Red, orange, and yellow carotenoid-colored plumages have been considered honest signals of condition; however, sex differences in feather pigments and microstructures are not well understood. Here, we show that microstructures, rather than carotenoid pigments, seem to be a major driver of male–female color differences in the social, sexually-dimorphic tanager genus Ramphocelus. We comprehensively quantified feather (i) color (using spectrophotometry), (ii) pigments (using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)), and (iii) microstructures (using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) optical modeling). Males have significantly more saturated color patches than females. However, our exploratory analysis of pigments suggested that males and females have concordant carotenoid pigment profiles across all species (MCMCglmm model, female:male ratio = 0.95). Male, but not female, feathers have elaborate microstructures which amplify color appearance. Oblong, expanded feather barbs in males enhance color saturation (for the same amount of pigment) by increasing the transmission of optical power through the feather. Dihedral barbules (vertically-angled, strap-shaped barbules) in males reduce total reflectance to generate “super black” and “velvet red” plumage. Melanin in females explains some, but not all, of the male–female plumage differences. Our results suggest that a widely cited index of honesty, carotenoid pigments, cannot fully explain male appearance. We propose that males are selected to evolve amplifiers—in this case, microstructures that enhance appearance—that are not necessarily themselves linked to quality.
Funder
U.S. Department of Defense
Harvard University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference116 articles.
1. Hill, G. E. Sexiness, individual condition, and species identity: the information signaled by ornaments and assessed by choosing females. Evol. Biol. 42, 251–259 (2015).
2. Prum, R. O. Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin’s really dangerous idea. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 2253–2265 (2012).
3. Fisher, R. A. The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete edition (Oxford University Press, 1999).
4. Dawkins, M. S. & Guilford, T. Sensory bias and the adaptiveness of female choice. Am. Nat. 1, 937–942 (1996).
5. Simons, M. J. P., Cohen, A. A. & Verhulst, S. What does carotenoid-dependent coloration tell? Plasma carotenoid level signals immunocompetence and oxidative stress state in birds-a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 7, 1 (2012).
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献