Author:
Chen Chong,He Wei,Zhou Han,Xue Yaru,Zhu Mingda
Abstract
AbstractGroundwater is unique resource for agriculture, domestic use, industry and environment in the Heihe River Basin, northwestern China. Numerical models are effective approaches to simulate and analyze the groundwater dynamics under changeable conditions and have been widely used all over the world. In this paper, the groundwater dynamics of the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin was simulated using one numerical model and three machine learning algorithms (multi-layer perceptron (MLP); radial basis function network (RBF); support vector machine (SVM)). Historical groundwater levels and streamflow rates were used to calibrate/train and verify the different methods. The root mean square error and R2 were used to evaluate the accuracy of the simulation/training and verification results. The results showed that the accuracy of machine learning models was significantly better than that of numerical model in both stages. The SVM and RBF performed the best in training and verification stages, respectively. However, it should be noted that the generalization ability of numerical model is superior to the machine learning models because of the inclusion of physical mechanism. This study provides a feasible and accurate approach for simulating groundwater dynamics and a reference for model selection.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Loucks, D. P., Kindler, J. & Fedra, K. Interactive Water Resources Modeling and Model Use: An Overview. Water Resour. Res. 21, 95–102, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i002p00095 (1985).
2. Singh, A. Groundwater resources management through the applications of simulation modeling: A review. ScTEn 499, 414–423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.048 (2014).
3. Harbaugh, A. W. MODFLOW-2005: The US Geological Survey modular ground-water model–The ground-water flow process. Report No. 6-A16, (U.S. Geol. Surv., Tech. Methods 2005).
4. Markstrom, S. L., Niswonger, R. G., Regan, R. S., Prudic, D. E. & Barlow, P. M. GSFLOW - Coupled Ground-Water and Surface-Water Flow Model Based on the Integration of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) and the Modular Ground-Water Flow Model (MODFLOW-2005). Report No. 6-D1, 240 2008).
5. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R. & Williams, J. R. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. (Texas Water Resources Institute 2011).
Cited by
135 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献