Haptic communication optimises joint decisions and affords implicit confidence sharing

Author:

Pezzulo Giovanni,Roche Lucas,Saint-Bauzel Ludovic

Abstract

AbstractGroup decisions can outperform the choices of the best individual group members. Previous research suggested that optimal group decisions require individuals to communicate explicitly (e.g., verbally) their confidence levels. Our study addresses the untested hypothesis that implicit communication using a sensorimotor channel—haptic coupling—may afford optimal group decisions, too. We report that haptically coupled dyads solve a perceptual discrimination task more accurately than their best individual members; and five times faster than dyads using explicit communication. Furthermore, our computational analyses indicate that the haptic channel affords implicit confidence sharing. We found that dyads take leadership over the choice and communicate their confidence in it by modulating both the timing and the force of their movements. Our findings may pave the way to negotiation technologies using fast sensorimotor communication to solve problems in groups.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Office of Naval Research Global

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference55 articles.

1. Moshman, D. & Geil, M. Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Think. Reason. 4, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467898394148 (1998).

2. Bang, D. & Frith, C. D. Making better decisions in groups. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4 (2017). http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/8/170193. http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/8/170193.full.pdf.

3. Bahrami, B. et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science 329, 1081–1085 (2010). http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5995/1081. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5995/1081.full.pdf.

4. Bahrami, B. et al. What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 1350–1365 (2012).

5. Fusaroli, R. et al. Coming to terms: Quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychol. Sci. 23, 931–939 (2012).

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3