Author:
Song Qingyuan,Fu Weiping,Wang Wen,Sun Yuan,Wang Denggui,Zhou Jincao
Abstract
AbstractThe behavior intention estimation and interaction between Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and human traffic participants are the key problems in Automatic Driving System (ADS). When the classical decision theory studies implicitly assume that the behavior of human traffic participants is completely rational. However, according to the booming quantum decision theory in recent years and actual traffic cases, traffic behaviors and other human behaviors are often irrational and violate the assumptions of classical cognitive and decision theory. This paper explores the decision-making problem in the two-car game scene based on quantum decision theory and compares it with the current mainstream method of studying irrational behavior-Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) model. The comparative analysis proved that the Quantum Game Theory (QGT) model can explain the separation effect which the classical probability model can’t reveal, and it has more advantages than CPT model in dealing with game scene decision-making. When two cars interact with each other, the QGT model can consider the interests of both sides from the perspective of the other car. Compared with the classical probability model and CPT model, the QGT is more realistic in the behavior decision-making of ADS.
Funder
Shaanxi Youth Fund Project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Schwarting, W., Alonso-Mora, J. & Rus, D. Planningand decision-making for autonomous vehicles. Ann. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 1, 187–210 (2018).
2. Liu, C. L. & Tomizuka M. Enabling safe freeway driving for automated vehicles. In 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), Boston, USA, July 6–8, 3461–3467 (2016).
3. Gupta, S., Vasardani, M. & Winter, S. Negotiation between vehicles and pedestrians for the right of way at intersections. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 20(3), 888–899 (2019).
4. Osamu, K. Nash equilibrium with uncertainty: Uncertainty makes irrationality. Int. J. Game Theory 12, 4367–4377 (2012).
5. Smart car technology, self-driving and what other long tail problems need to be solved? [EB/OL]. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/97958737?from_voters_page=true (2019).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献