Fish response to the presence of hydrokinetic turbines as a sustainable energy solution
-
Published:2023-05-08
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Müller Stephanie,Muhawenimana Valentine,Sonnino-Sorisio Guglielmo,Wilson Catherine A. M. E.,Cable Joanne,Ouro Pablo
Abstract
AbstractHydrokinetic turbines such as vertical axis turbines (VATs) may provide decentralised, clean, sustainable energy for remote communities that lack access to the main energy grid or renewable resources. As traditional hydropower adversely alters aquatic ecosystems, it is essential to evaluate the environmental consequences of deploying VATs in riverine ecosystems to meet current and future energy needs. This study explores the implications of VATs on fish movement by observing fish swimming behaviour under two discharges, turbine operation states, and cross-sections confinements using scaled laboratory experiments. Our findings reveal that for cross-sectional confined conditions neither discharge, turbine presence, nor device operation, prevented fish from passing around and through the turbine both in the up- and downstream directions. However, fish spent the least time near the turbine vicinity and within the turbine’s turbulent, low-velocity wake, indicating avoidance behaviour. Swimming in a less confined test section further reduced the time spent within the turbine’s vicinity and wake, increasing the distance fish kept away from the device. Our results contribute to an understanding of VATs as low-risk hazards for fish swimming behaviour, advancing the potential of deploying VATs in rivers, estuaries or sea as a renewable energy solution for remote communities.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference41 articles.
1. United Nation. Affordable and Clean Energy: People Around the World Lack Access to Electricity. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/7_Why-It-Matters-2020.pdf. 2. Winemiller, O., McIntyre, P.B., Castello, L., Fluet-Chouunard, E., Giarrizzo, T., Nma., S., Baird, L.G., Darwall, W., Lujan, N.K., Harrison, I., Stiassny, M.L.J., Silvao, R.A.M., Fitzgerald, D.B., Pelicice, F.M., Agostinho, A.A., Gomes, L.C., Albert, J.S., Baran, E., Jr., M.P., Zarfl, C., Mulligan, M., Sullivan, J.P., Arantes, C.C., Sousa, L.M., Koning, A.A., Hoeinghaus, D.J., Sabaj, M., Lundberg, J.G., Armbruster, J., Thieme, M.L., Petry, P., Zuanon, J., Vilara, G.T., Snoeks, J., Ou, C., Rainboth, W., Pavanelli, C.S., Akama, A., van Soesbergen, A., & Sáenz, L. Balancing Hydropower and Biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082. 3. Couto, T. B. A., Messager, M. L. & Olden, J. D. Safeguarding migratory fish via strategic planning of future small hydropower in brazil. Nat. Sustain. 4, 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00665-4 (2021). 4. Selinger, C., & Zeiringer, B. River Connectivity, Habitat Fragmentation and Related Restoration Measures. Book section in Riverine Ecosystem Management, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_9 (2018). 5. Jones, J. et al. A comprehensive assessment of stream fragmentation in Great Britain. Sci. Total Environ. 673, 756–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.125 (2019).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|