Abstract
AbstractDirectional selection in a population yields reduced genetic variance due to the Bulmer effect. While this effect has been thoroughly investigated in mammals, it is poorly studied in social insects with biological peculiarities such as haplo-diploidy or the collective expression of traits. In addition to the natural adaptation to climate change, parasites, and pesticides, honeybees increasingly experience artificial selection pressure through modern breeding programs. Besides selection, many honeybee breeding schemes introduce controlled mating. We investigated which individual effects selection and controlled mating have on genetic variance. We derived formulas to describe short-term changes of genetic variance in honeybee populations and conducted computer simulations to confirm them. Thereby, we found that the changes in genetic variance depend on whether the variance is measured between queens (inheritance criterion), worker groups (selection criterion), or both (performance criterion). All three criteria showed reduced genetic variance under selection. In the selection and performance criteria, our formulas and simulations showed an increased genetic variance through controlled mating. This newly described effect counterbalanced and occasionally outweighed the Bulmer effect. It could not be observed in the inheritance criterion. A good understanding of the different notions of genetic variance in honeybees, therefore, appears crucial to interpreting population parameters correctly.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics(clinical),Genetics
Reference52 articles.
1. Andonov S, Costa C, Uzunov A, Bergomi P, Lourenco D, Misztal I (2019) Modeling honey yield, defensive and swarming behaviors of Italian honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica) using linear-threshold approaches. BMC Genet 20:78
2. Atkins KD, Thompson R (1986) Predicted and realized responses to selection for an index of bone length and body weight in Scottish Blackface sheep. 1. Responses in the index and component traits. Anim Prod 44:421–435
3. Bernstein R, Plate M, Hoppe A, Bienefeld K (2018) Computing inbreeding coefficients and the inverse numerator relationship matrix in large populations of honey bees. J Anim Breed Genet 135:323–332
4. Beye M, Gattermeier I, Hasselmann M, Gempe T, Schioett M, Baines JF et al. (2006) Exceptionally high levels of recombination across the honey bee genome. Genome Res 16:1139–1144
5. Bienefeld K, Ehrhardt K, Reinhardt F (2007) Genetic evaluation in the honey bee considering queen and worker effects—a BLUP—animal model approach. Apidologie 38:77–85
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献