Comparison of the 2022 and 2017 European LeukemiaNet risk classifications in a real-life cohort of the PETHEMA group
-
Published:2023-05-12
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2044-5385
-
Container-title:Blood Cancer Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Blood Cancer J.
Author:
Sargas ClaudiaORCID, Ayala RosaORCID, Larráyoz María J., Chillón María C., Rodriguez-Arboli EduardoORCID, Bilbao Cristina, Prados de la Torre EstherORCID, Martínez-Cuadrón DavidORCID, Rodríguez-Veiga RebecaORCID, Boluda Blanca, Gil Cristina, Bernal Teresa, Bergua JuanORCID, Algarra Lorenzo, Tormo MarORCID, Martínez-Sánchez PilarORCID, Soria Elena, Serrano Josefina, Alonso-Dominguez Juan M.ORCID, García Raimundo, Amigo María Luz, Herrera-Puente Pilar, Sayas María J., Lavilla-Rubira EsperanzaORCID, Martínez-López Joaquín, Calasanz María J.ORCID, García-Sanz RamónORCID, Pérez-Simón José A.ORCID, Gómez Casares María T., Sánchez-García Joaquín, Barragán EvaORCID, Montesinos Pau, Prados de la Torre Esther,
Abstract
AbstractNext-Generation Sequencing is needed for the accurate genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. We validated and compared the 2022 ELN risk classification in a real-life cohort of 546 intensively and 379 non-intensively treated patients. Among fit patients, those aged ≥65 years old showed worse OS than younger regardless risk classification. Compared with the 2017 classification, 14.5% of fit patients changed the risk with the 2022 classification, increasing the high-risk group from 44.3% to 51.8%. 3.7% and 0.9% FLT3-ITD mutated patients were removed from the favorable and adverse 2017 categories respectively to 2022 intermediate risk group. We suggest that midostaurin therapy could be a predictor for 3 years OS (85.2% with vs. 54.8% without midostaurin, P = 0.04). Forty-seven (8.6%) patients from the 2017 intermediate group were assigned to the 2022 adverse-risk group as they harbored myelodysplasia (MDS)-related mutations. Patients with one MDS-related mutation did not reach median OS, while patients with ≥2 mutations had 13.6 months median OS (P = 0.002). Patients with TP53 ± complex karyotype or inv(3) had a dismal prognosis (7.1 months median OS). We validate the prognostic utility of the 2022 ELN classification in a real-life setting providing supportive evidences to improve risk stratification guidelines.
Funder
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Oncology,Hematology
Reference31 articles.
1. Llop M, Sargas C, Barragán E. The role of next-generation sequencing in acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Opin Oncol. 2022;34:723–8. 2. Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, Akkari Y, Alaggio R, Apperley JF, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36:1703–19. 3. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, Borowitz MJ, Calvo KR, Kvasnicka HM, et al. International consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: integrating morphological, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140:1200–28. 4. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR, Craddock C, DiNardo CD, Dombret H, et al. Diagnosis and Management of AML in Adults: 2022 ELN Recommendations from an International Expert Panel. Blood. 2022 [cited 2 August 2022]; Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35797463/. 5. Ravandi F, Walter RB, Freeman SD. Evaluating measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2018;2:1356–66. https://ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/article/2/11/1356/16057/Evaluating-measurable-residual-disease-in-acute
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|