Risk scoring in surgical patients

Author:

Jones H J S1,de Cossart L1

Affiliation:

1. Countess of Chester Hospital, Liverpool Road, Chester CH2 1UL, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background A large number of scoring systems for assessing a patient's risk of complications or death has been developed over recent years. This is a review of those that are of relevance to general surgeons. Methods A Medline literature search was performed to identify all articles concerning ‘severity of illness’, ‘morbidity’, ‘mortality’ and ‘postoperative complications’ in the field of surgery from 1966 to 1997. Further searches were performed to find papers about specific identified scoring systems, and relevant articles from the reference lists of these were also sought. Results and conclusion The advantages of an accurate assessment of a patient's risk include, on an individual level, the opportunity to give a more accurate prognosis and choose the most appropriate treatment. If the risk of an adverse outcome is known for a group of patients, the actual outcome can be compared with the predicted outcome, and comparison can be made between groups in different surgical units for the purposes of audit or research. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) is the most appropriate of the currently available scores for general surgical practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Reference72 articles.

1. The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality;Dripps;JAMA,1961

2. A statistical analysis of the relationship of physical status to postoperative mortality in 63 388 cases;Vacanti;Anesth Analg,1970

3. ASA status and age predict adverse events after abdominal surgery;Hall;J Qual Clin Pract,1996

4. Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery;Klotz;Br J Surg,1996

5. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures;Goldman;N Engl J Med,1977

Cited by 164 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3