Author:
Chen Li,Zhu Jianing,Yang Cunyi
Abstract
We present two approaches to forecast parameters in the SABR model. The first approach is the vector auto-regressive moving-average model (VARMA) for the time series of the in-sample calibrated parameters, and the second is based on machine learning techniques called epsilon-support vector regression (ε-SVR). Using daily data of S&P 500 ETF option prices from 2014 Jan 01 to 2018 Dec 31, we first calibrate the daily values of the model parameters from the training sample, then conduct out-of-sample forecasting of parameters and pricing of options. Both approaches produce good fits between the forecasted and calibrated parameters for out-of-sample dates. A comparison study shows that using forecasted parameters as inputs, the SABR model generates better pricing results than assuming constant parameters or using lag parameters. We also discuss the market conditions under which one approach outperforms the other.
Reference14 articles.
1. Bin, C. (2007). Calibration of the Heston model with application in derivative pricing and hedging. Master's thesis, Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
2. The principle of not feeling the boundary for the SABR model;Chen;Quantitative Finance,2019
3. The equivalent constant-elasticity-of-variance (CEV) volatility of the stochastic-alpha-beta-rho (SABR) model;Choi;Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 128,2021
4. Full and fast calibration of the Heston stochastic volatility model;Cui;European Journal of Operational Research 263,2017
5. Mass at zero in the uncorrelated SABR model and implied volatility asymptotics;Gulisashvili;Quantitative Finance,2018
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献