Affiliation:
1. Purdue University-Calumet
Abstract
An examination of the files of a scientific journal demonstrates a deep editorial concern for style and arrangement. Stylistic changes are invariably made either for the sake of clarity, simplicity, concision, or specificity. Changes in arrangement are of two kinds, each with its own purpose: between paragraphs within sections, these changes are made in the interest of sequential clarity; on the other hand, redistributions from section to section are designed clearly to demarcate section content: e.g., results only in Results. Several conclusions are reached: 1) traditional advice, especially on style, does not always reflect best editorial practice; 2) problems of arrangement call for different kinds of solution from those of style: the former having a “best,” the latter only a “better” solution; 3) stylistic changes are tactical choices made within the context of strategic presuppositions about the impersonal and descriptive nature of scientific prose.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Enlisting the Power of the Verb;Story, Not Study: 30 Brief Lessons to Inspire Health Researchers as Writers;2021
2. A Longinian concept and methodology for technical communication;Technical Communication Quarterly;1998-03
3. Rhetorical logic and the integration of rhetoric and science;Communication Monographs;1990-12
4. Technical Journal Editors and Writing Style;Journal of Technical Writing and Communication;1990-04