Laparoscopic and Psychologic Evaluation of Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain

Author:

Richter Holly E.1,Holley Robert L.1,Chandraiah Shambhavi1,Varner R. Edward1

Affiliation:

1. University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine

Abstract

Objective:Pelvic pain can account for up to 40 percent of laparoscopies performed by gynecologists. This report compares the psychological profiles and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery at long-term follow-up in a series of laparoscopy-positive and laparoscopy-negative patients with chronic pelvic pain.Method:A retrospective chart review was performed on patients diagnosed with chronic pelvic pain combined with postoperative written questionnaires and self-rating scales. These questionnaires were used to assess long-term post laparoscopy follow-up of the physical and psychological status of women with positive findings at laparoscopy compared to those women with negative findings.Results:There were no statistically significant demographic differences between respondents and nonrespondents. In the respondents, no statistically significant differences were noted even with long-term follow-up when comparing responses of the laparoscopy-positive and laparoscopy-negative groups on the above questionnaires.Conclusion:Though reporting modest improvement in pelvic pain since laparoscopy, both groups reported a high incidence of anxiety, depression, physical worries, and marital/sexual problems.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. When you see nothing at all: Outcomes following a negative laparoscopy. A systematic review;Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology;2023-09-22

2. Chronischer Unterbauchschmerz;Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe;2020

3. Pelvic Pain: Clinical Features;Pain Imaging;2019

4. Douleurs pelviennes;EMC - Médecine d 'urgence;2013-03

5. Chronischer Unterbauchschmerz;Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe;2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3