Students' Learning Styles and Their Preferences for Online Instructional Methods

Author:

Butler Thomas J.1,Pinto-Zipp Genevieve1

Affiliation:

1. Rockland Community College and Seton Hall University

Abstract

In an attempt to serve online students' needs, several questions were asked: Is there a dominant learning style of students in online courses? Is there a preferred method of online instruction? Is there a relationship between learning styles and the preferred method of online instruction? A two-part survey was administered to all graduate students enrolled in SetonWorldWide. Part A consisted of the Gregorc Learning Styles Delineator (GSD) and Part B consisted of demographic questions and a Likert scale focusing on the rating of online instructional methods. Subjects ( N = 96) displayed varied learning styles with dual learning styles (56.2%) representing the largest group. Subjects demonstrated strong preferences for asynchronous log-ons (99%), a high degree of interaction within the course, and noted a high degree of satisfaction with their online programs (95%). Convenience was the most frequent reason reported (92%) for selecting a Web course. The strongest preferences were noted for instructional activities emphasizing convenience, time management, and interactivity. Correlation analysis between students' learning styles scores and six online instructional methods revealed several significant relationships which were inconsistent with personality traits. It was found that students enrolled in online education because of the convenience, displayed a dual learning style, and favored individual assignments and threaded discussions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Students’ learning preferences for forms and activities – suggestions for academic teachers;Przegląd Organizacji;2023-12-30

2. Predicting Preferences in Online Courses;2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT);2022-07

3. Do learners really have different preferences?;2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT);2022-07

4. Emergency remote learning acceptance among higher education students during COVID-19 pandemic;Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business;2021-12-31

5. Dominant Learning Styles of Interior Design Students in Generation Z;Journal of Interior Design;2021-07-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3