We must discuss research environments

Author:

Gallacher John1ORCID,Webster Chris2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK

2. Healthy High Density Cities Lab, Department of Urban Planning and Design, HKU Institute of Data Science, HKU Urban Systems Institute, Hong Kong University , Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong

Abstract

A major challenge facing the biomedical community is creating and sustaining high-quality research environments. A literature search identified five common themes underlying biomedical research environments comprising collaboration, data access, user-led innovation, data provenance and a deep commitment to public and scientific benefit. Club theory is used to develop a model describing social structures that underpin these themes. It is argued that collaboration underlies impactful science and that collaboration is hindered by high transaction costs. This, combined with poorly defined property rights surrounding publicly funded data, limits the ability of data markets to operate efficiently. Although the science community is best placed to provide solutions for these issues, incentivization by funding agencies to increase the benefits of collaboration and reduce uncoordinated activity will be an accelerator. Given the complexity of emerging datasets and the collaborations needed to exploit them, trust-by-design solutions are suggested. The underlying motivational ‘glue’ that holds this activity together is the aesthetic and ethical value base underlying good science. The model has implications for data-driven science more generally. As biomedical science in the Global South develops, there is an opportunity to address foundational structural issues prospectively rather than inherit unwanted constraints of current practice.

Funder

UK Economic and Social Research Council

Medical Research Council

HKSAR Research Grants Council, Collaborative Research Fund

Publisher

The Royal Society

Reference42 articles.

1. Lennox JC . 2021 Cosmic chemistry: do God and science mix dry? Oxford, UK: Lion.

2. Research Excellence Framework . 2021 REF cost evaluation: final report. Technopolis Group. See https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/9184/1/REF_2021_cost_evaluation_final_report.pdf (accessed 19 February 2024).

3. Research Excellence Framework . 2023 Guidance on REF 2021 results. REF. See https://archive.ref.ac.uk/guidance-on-results/guidance-on-ref-2021-results/ (accessed 19 February 2024).

4. HM Government . 2020 UK Research and Development Roadmap. HM Government. See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5efb9799e90e075c59a7b3f9/UK_Research_and_Development_Roadmap.pdf (accessed 19 February 2024).

5. The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. We must discuss research environments;Royal Society Open Science;2024-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3