Introduction

Author:

Gardner R. L.1,Surani M. A.2,Solter D.3

Affiliation:

1. Mammalian Development Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

2. Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK

3. Department of Developmental Biology, MaxPlanck Institut of Immunobiology, Stubeweg 51, D-79011 Freiburg, Germany

Abstract

The elaboration of a physiologically integrated organism from a fertilized egg depends on processes of cellular growth and diversification that require very precise coordination in both space and time. The extent to which the final outcome is presaged in the egg is an issue that has engaged those seeking to explain embryonic development since antiquity. According to the concept of preformation espoused by Charles Bonnet, the new organism was already present in its final form in the egg, so that development simply entailed enlargement without any accompanying increase in complexity (Oppenheimer 1967). This extreme view was shown to be untenable by Caspar Friedrich Wolff, whose relevant studies included careful documentation of the emergence of increasingly complex organization during the course of embryogenesis in the chick. As a result, the opposing concept of epigenesis, namely that order and form emerge de novo during the course of development, rapidly gained dominance (Oppenheimer 1967). However, by the latter half of the nineteenth century, preformation was revived in a subtler guise to explain the development of various marine invertebrates in which both patterns of cleavage and differentiation of the resulting blastomeres were essentially invariant. Here, cellular diversification was attributed to the localization within the cytoplasm of the egg of factors, or ‘determinants’, which dictated the fate of the cells that inherited them. The stereotypical pattern of cleavage exhibited by such organisms was referred to as ‘mosaic’, in contrast to the variable or ‘regulative’ pattern shown by many others. Mosaic soon came to be equated with a determinant–based or neo–preformationist, and regulative with an epigenetic, view of development. We now know that this distinction is not valid because cellular interactions play a vital part in the development even of organisms with invariant lineage like Caenorhabditis elegans, whereas ‘determinants’ such as those for the germline occur in species whose lineage is variable.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3