Abstract
The past 30 years has seen a remarkable development in our understanding of how the auditory system - particularly the peripheral system - processes complex sounds. Perhaps the most significant has been our understanding of the mechanisms underlying auditory frequency selectivity and their importance for normal and impaired auditory processing. Physiologically vulnerable cochlear filtering can account for many aspects of our normal and impaired psychophysical frequency selectivity with important consequences for the perception of complex sounds. For normal hearing, remarkable mechanisms in the organ of Corti, involving enhancement of mechanical tuning (in mammals probably by feedback of electro-mechanically generated energy from the hair cells), produce exquisite tuning, reflected in the tuning properties of cochlear nerve fibres. Recent comparisons of physiological (cochlear nerve) and psychophysical frequency selectivity in the same species indicate that the ear’s overall frequency selectivity can be accounted for by this cochlear filtering, at least in band width terms. Because this cochlear filtering is physiologically vulnerable, it deteriorates in deleterious conditions of the cochlea - hypoxia, disease, drugs, noise overexposure, mechanical disturbance - and is reflected in impaired psychophysical frequency selectivity. This is a fundamental feature of sensorineural hearing loss of cochlear origin, and is of diagnostic value. This cochlear filtering, particularly as reflected in the temporal patterns of cochlear fibres to complex sounds, is remarkably robust over a wide range of stimulus levels. Furthermore, cochlear filtering properties are a prime determinant of the ‘place’ and ‘time’ coding of frequency at the cochlear nerve level, both of which appear to be involved in pitch perception. The problem of how the place and time coding of complex sounds is effected over the ear’s remarkably wide dynamic range is briefly addressed. In the auditory brainstem, particularly the dorsal cochlear nucleus, are inhibitory mechanisms responsible for enhancing the spectral and temporal contrasts in complex sounds. These mechanisms are now being dissected neuropharmacologically. At the cortical level, mechanisms are evident that are capable of abstracting biologically relevant features of complex sounds. Fundamental studies of how the auditory system encodes and processes complex sounds are vital to promising recent applications in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of the hearing impaired.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference57 articles.
1. de Boer E. 1969 Reverse correlation II. In itiatio n o f nerve impulses in the inner ear. Proc. Konikl. Nederl. Akademie van Wetenshappen- series C Amsterdam722 129-151.
2. Bogdanski D.F. & G alam bos R. 1960 Studies of the auditory system with im planted electrodes. In Neural mechanisms o f auditory and vestibular systems (ed. G. L. Rasmussen & W. F. W indle) pp. 143-148. Springfield: C harles C. T hom as. W orden) pp. 131-145. C am bridge: M .I.T . Press.
3. Evans E.F. 19746 A uditory frequency selectivity an d the cochlear nerve. In: Facts and models in hearing (ed. E. Zwicker & E. T e rh a rd ) pp. 118-129. H eidelberg: Springer-V erlag.
4. Evans E.F. 1975a T h e cochlear nerve an d cochlear nucleus. In Handbook o f sensory physiology Vol. V /2 (A uditory System) (ed. W. D. K eidel & W. D. N eff) pp. 1-108. H eidelberg: S pringer-V erlag.
5. The Sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献