Aspirin and cancer: biological mechanisms and clinical outcomes

Author:

Elwood Peter1ORCID,Protty Majd2,Morgan Gareth3,Pickering Janet1,Delon Christine4,Watkins John1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales CF10 3AT, UK

2. Department of Cardiology, Cardiff Lipidomic Group, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK

3. Public Health Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK

4. Independent Research, London, England, UK

Abstract

Evidence on aspirin and cancer comes from two main sources: (1) the effect of aspirin upon biological mechanisms in cancer, and (2) clinical studies of patients with cancer, some of whom take aspirin. A series of systematic literature searches identified published reports relevant to these two sources. The effects of aspirin upon biological mechanisms involved in cancer initiation and growth appear to generate reasonable expectations of effects upon the progress and mortality of cancer. Clinical evidence on aspirin appears overall to be favourable to the use of aspirin, but evidence from randomized trials is limited, and inconsistent. The main body of evidence comes from meta-analyses of observational studies of patients with a wide range of cancers, about 25% of whom were taking aspirin. Heterogeneity is large but, overall, aspirin is associated with increases in survival and reductions in metastatic spread and vascular complications of different cancers. It is important that evaluations of aspirin used as an adjunct cancer treatment are based upon all the available relevant evidence, and there appears to be a marked harmony between the effects of aspirin upon biological mechanisms and upon the clinical progress of cancer.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Immunology,General Neuroscience

Reference86 articles.

1. Can cardiovascular drugs support cancer treatment? The rationale for drug repurposing

2. Old drugs with new tricks

3. Functional versus chemical diversity: is biodiversity important for drug discovery?

4. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. 2017 Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017) results. Seattle, WA: United States Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).

5. IARC. 2020. Cancer today. See https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3