Affiliation:
1. United United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Campus , Abingdon, Oxon OX14 3DB, UK
2. DIFFER—Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research, De Zaale 20 , Eindhoven 5612, Netherlands
Abstract
Success of the UK’s Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) programme requires a robust plasma control system. This system has to guide the plasma from initiation to the burning phase, maintain it there, produce the desired fusion power for the desired duration and then terminate the plasma safely. This has to be done in a challenging environment with limited sensors and without overloading plasma-facing components. The plasma parameters and the operational regime in the STEP prototype will be very different from tokamaks, which are presently in operation. During fusion burn, the plasma regime in STEP will be self-organizing, adding further complications to the plasma control system design. This article describes the work to date on the design of individual controllers for plasma shape and position, magneto hydrodynamic instabilities, heat load and fusion power. Having studied ‘normal’ operation, the article discusses the philosophy of how the system will handle exceptions, when things do not go exactly as planned.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘Delivering Fusion Energy – The Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP)’.
Reference57 articles.
1. STEP—on the pathway to fusion commercialization
2. Conceptual design workflow for the STEP Prototype Powerplant
3. Meyer H et al . 2023 The plasma scenarios for the spherical tokamak for energy production (STEP) and their technical implications. In Proceedings 29th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, London, UK.
4. Plasma control for the step prototype power plant
5. Plasma burn—mind the gap
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Plasma burn—mind the gap;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-08-26
2. Digital: accelerating the pathway;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-08-26
3. Staying positive: producing net power;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-08-26
4. Concept design overview: a question of choices and compromise;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-08-26
5. Fusing together an outline design for sustained fuelling and tritium self-sufficiency;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-08-26