Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, T2N 1N4
2. School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK
Abstract
Abstract concepts, like
justice
and
friendship
, are central features of our daily lives. Traditionally, abstract concepts are distinguished from other concepts in that they cannot be directly experienced through the senses. As such, they pose a challenge for strongly embodied models of semantic representation that assume a central role for sensorimotor information. There is growing recognition, however, that it is possible for meaning to be ‘grounded’ via cognitive systems, including those involved in processing language and emotion. In this article, we focus on the specific proposal that
social
significance is a key feature in the representation of some concepts. We begin by reviewing recent evidence in favour of this proposal from the fields of psycholinguistics and neuroimaging. We then discuss the limited extent to which there is consensus about the definition of ‘socialness’ and propose essential next steps for research in this domain. Taking one such step, we describe preliminary data from an unprecedented large-scale rating study that can help determine how socialness is distinct from other facets of word meaning. We provide a backdrop of contemporary theories regarding semantic representation and social cognition and highlight important predictions for both brain and behaviour.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘Concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences’.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
UK Research and Innovation
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology