Neural specialisation for concrete and abstract concepts revealed through meta-analysis

Author:

Hoffman Paul,Bair Matthew

Abstract

AbstractIdentifying the brain regions that process concrete and abstract concepts is key to understanding the neural architecture of thought, memory and language. We review current theories of concreteness effects and test their neural predictions in a meta-analysis of 72 neuroimaging studies (1400 participants). Concrete concepts preferentially activated visual and action processing regions, particularly when presented in sentences. Abstract concepts preferentially activated networks for social cognition (particularly for sentences), and for language and semantic control (particularly when presented as single words). These results suggest that concrete and abstract concepts vary both in the information-processing modalities they engage and in the demands they place on cognitive control processes. Specialisation for both concept types was present in different parts of the default mode network (DMN), with effects dissociating along a social-spatial axis. Concrete concepts generated greater activation in a medial temporal DMN component, implicated in constructing mental models of spatial contexts and scenes. In contrast, abstract concepts showed greater activation in frontotemporal DMN regions involved in theory-of-mind and language processing. These results support prior claims that generating models of situations and events is a core DMN function and further indicate specialisation within DMN for different aspects of these models.Public significance statementThe distinction between concrete and abstract concepts is fundamental to language and cognition. Here, we present the largest meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies experiments investigating this distinction, including data from 1400 participants. Our results indicate that concrete and abstract language differentially engages a range of neural systems involved in perception, action, language and social processing. These results provide new insights into how the brain constructs representations of the world from linguistic information, and into the neural basis of imagination.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3