Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA
2. Center for the Philosophy of Freedom, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Abstract
The lower female competitiveness often found in economic experiments presents a puzzle. If accumulating wealth and reaching high status affords women essential benefits for themselves and their children, why do women appear less competitive? By looking at behavioural strategies from a cooperative breeding perspective, we propose that women may have evolved an adaptation to strategically suppress competitiveness to elicit cooperation for the benefit of raising offspring. To support this idea, we review the literature that shows that women's behaviour is, in general, more reactive than men's to the social conditions of the different games. In particular, we focus on our experimental work where we show that women are not less competitive than men once the games evoke a parenting frame (by substituting cash with rewards that could benefit the participants' offspring), a gender-typical one (by using vouchers for prizes acceptable as domain of female interests), or include a prosocial option (by allowing winners to share some of the gains with losers). We conclude that, for women, nurturing the potential for cooperation intertwines with competitiveness to produce a complex, adaptive female social strategy.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘Cooperation among women: evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives’.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference141 articles.
1. Bertrand M. 2011 New perspectives on gender. In Handbook of labor economics, vol. 4 (eds D Card, O Ashenfelter), pp. 1543-1590. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. (doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02415-4)
2. Gender Differences in Preferences
3. The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations
4. Altonji J, Blank R. 1999 Race and gender in the labor market. In Handbook of labor economics, vol. 3 (eds OC Ashenfelter, D Card), pp. 3143-3259. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
5. The U.S. Gender Pay Gap in the 1990S: Slowing Convergence
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献