No strong evidence for universal gender differences in the development of cooperative behaviour across societies

Author:

House Bailey1ORCID,Silk Joan B.2,McAuliffe Katherine3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK

2. School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

3. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA

Abstract

Human cooperation varies both across and within societies, and developmental studies can inform our understanding of the sources of both kinds of variation. One key candidate for explaining within-society variation in cooperative behaviour is gender, but we know little about whether gender differences in cooperation take root early in ontogeny or emerge similarly across diverse societies. Here, we explore two existing cross-cultural datasets of 4- to 15-year-old children's preferences for equality in experimental tasks measuring prosociality (14 societies) and fairness (seven societies), and we look for evidence of (i) widespread gender differences in the development of cooperation, and (ii) substantial societal variation in gender differences. This cross-cultural approach is crucial for revealing universal human gender differences in the development of cooperation, and it helps answer recent calls for greater cultural diversity in the study of human development. We find that gender has little impact on the development of prosociality and fairness within these datasets, and we do not find much evidence for substantial societal variation in gender differences. We discuss the implications of these findings for our knowledge about the nature and origin of gender differences in cooperation, and for future research attempting to study human development using diverse cultural samples. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Cooperation among women: evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives’.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference43 articles.

1. Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment

2. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R. 2001 In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 73-78.

3. “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies

4. Ensminger J, Henrich J. 2014 Experimenting with social norms: fairness and punishment in cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

5. Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3