The uses and abuses of tree thinking in cultural evolution

Author:

Evans Cara L.1ORCID,Greenhill Simon J.12ORCID,Watts Joseph34ORCID,List Johann-Mattis1ORCID,Botero Carlos A.5ORCID,Gray Russell D.16ORCID,Kirby Kathryn R.17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07745, Germany

2. ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra 2700, Australia

3. Religion Programme, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand

4. Centre for Research on Evolution, Belief and Behaviour, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand

5. Department of Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63130, USA

6. School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand

7. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2

Abstract

Modern phylogenetic methods are increasingly being used to address questions about macro-level patterns in cultural evolution. These methods can illuminate the unobservable histories of cultural traits and identify the evolutionary drivers of trait change over time, but their application is not without pitfalls. Here, we outline the current scope of research in cultural tree thinking, highlighting a toolkit of best practices to navigate and avoid the pitfalls and ‘abuses' associated with their application. We emphasize two principles that support the appropriate application of phylogenetic methodologies in cross-cultural research: researchers should (1) draw on multiple lines of evidence when deciding if and which types of phylogenetic methods and models are suitable for their cross-cultural data, and (2) carefully consider how different cultural traits might have different evolutionary histories across space and time. When used appropriately phylogenetic methods can provide powerful insights into the processes of evolutionary change that have shaped the broad patterns of human history. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Foundations of cultural evolution'.

Funder

European Research Council

Marsden Fund of New Zealand

Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference102 articles.

1. D-PLACE: A Global Database of Cultural, Linguistic and Environmental Diversity

2. Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology

3. Cultural Phylogenetics

4. Cultural macroevolution matters

5. Greenhill SJ, Gray RD. 2009 Austronesian language phylogenies: myths and misconceptions about Bayesian computational methods. In Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: a Festschrift for Robert Blust (eds A Adelaar, A Pawley), pp. 375-397. Canberra, Australia: Pacific Linguistics.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3