The formation of political discussion networks

Author:

Hâncean Marian-Gabriel1ORCID,Perc Matjaž2345ORCID,Gheorghiță Adrian6,Vega Yon George G.7ORCID,Mihăilă Bianca-Elena1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, University of Bucharest, 90-92 Panduri St., Bucharest 050663, Romania

2. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia

3. Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404332, Taiwan

4. Alma Mater Europaea, Slovenska ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia

5. Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Josefstädterstraße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria

6. Department of Political Science, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 30 Expoziției Blvd., Bucharest 012244, Romania

7. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA

Abstract

Dialogues among politicians provide a window into political landscapes and relations among parties and nations. Existing research has focused on the outcomes of such dialogues and on the structure of social networks on which they take place. Little is known, however, about how political discussion networks form and which are the main driving forces behind their formation. We study a collection of ego-networks from 30 randomly sampled Romanian politicians to reveal fundamental processes behind the formation of political discussion networks. We show that ties in such networks tend to be strong and balanced, and that their organization is not affected by sex, age or education homophily. We use the exponential family of random graph models for small networks to assess likely closure mechanisms and possible homophily effects, but we note that further research and additional data are needed to fully understand the impact of context and political affiliations on the generalization of our findings.

Funder

Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii

Slovenian Research Agency

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference65 articles.

1. Huckfeldt RR, Beck PA. 1994 Contexts, intermediaries, and political behavior. In The dynamics of American politics: approaches and interpretations (eds LC Dodd, C Jilsson), pp. 252-276. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

2. The Incidental Pundit: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?

3. Price V. 2008 The SAGE handbook of public opinion research. In The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (eds W Donsbach, MW Traugott), London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.

4. Core Discussion Networks of Americans

5. Recent Developments in Network Measurement

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3