Abstract
We aim to review students’ conceptions of engineers and engineering accessed through their drawings. Accordingly, we enrolled in a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols. For that, we established the Web of Science as the source of information. After applying eligibility criteria, the search resulted in ten records. We observed that many reviewed studies enrolled in research designs which contained comparisons of groups, cohorts (cross-age) or pre-post-tests. However, they generally overlooked appropriate statistical tests. Overall, the studies evidenced that most students conceive engineers as males who work individually in manual activities and outdoor environments. The major contribution of this study is providing an overview of the investigation of children’s conceptions of engineering. Additionally, we call attention to the need for more research, teacher training, and carefully planned and executed activities that enhance students’ conceptions of engineers and engineering instead of worsening stereotypes—especially considering current curriculum proposals, such as STEAM education embracing engineering at precollege levels.
Publisher
FSFEI HE Don State Technical University
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Education
Reference39 articles.
1. Abbott, L., & Langston, A. (2005). Ethical research with very young children. inA. Farrell, (Ed.), Ethical Research with Children. (pp.37-48). Maidenhead, England; New York, USA: Open University Press.
2. Ata-Aktürk, A., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2021a). Engineers and engineering through the eyes of preschoolers: a phenomenographic study of children’s drawings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1974067
3. Ata-Aktürk, A., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2021b). An Analysis of Picture Books for Children Aged 3 to 6 Years: Portrayals of Engineers and the Engineering Design Process. International Journal of Early Childhood, 53(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-021-00294-8
4. Aurava, R., & Meriläinen, M. (2022). Expectations and realities: Examining adolescent students’ game jam experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4399–4426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10782-y
5. Cabello, V. M., Martinez, M. L., Armijo, S., & Maldonado, L. (2021). Promoting STEAM learning in the early years: “Pequeños Científicos” Program. International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1401
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献