Literature Review: A Snapshot of Research on the Argumentation of Bibliometric Analysis in the Period 2015-2023

Author:

Mulyani AsepORCID,Hartono HartonoORCID,Subali BambangORCID

Abstract

Argumentation has an important role in science education. One of the aims of science education is to develop argumentation skills as a basis for building scientific characterization. The role of argumentation in science education is one of the research topics that has received a lot of attention from academics. The purpose of this study was to analyze the research trend of argumentation in science education from 2015-2023. The research method used preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, or PRISMA for short, which consists of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. The articles analyzed were obtained using the publish or perish search engine from Scopus and Google Scholar, as many as 340 articles from a total search of 1013 articles. The analysis was conducted using content analysis and bibliometric using VOSviewer, which was reviewed based on network visualization, overlay visualization, and density visualization. The results were analyzed based on country of origin, research area, research method, research subject, research instrument, learning intervention, and argumentation type. The conclusion of this study shows that argumentation skills are one of the important topics in research that are linked with several other variables in science education and have received attention from researchers in recent years. Recommendations for future argumentation research should identify the characteristics of argumentation types and their relationship with teaching materials, learning models, and assessments in science education.

Publisher

FSFEI HE Don State Technical University

Reference51 articles.

1. Abdullah, K. H. (2022). Publication trends in biology education: a bibliometric review of 63 years. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 465–480. https://tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/1190

2. Admoko, S., R J, M. N., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim. (2021). Bibliometric profile of science education research on argumentation and the contribution of Indonesia. Advances in Engineering Research, 209(Ijcse), 502–509. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ijcse-21/125966505

3. Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença, D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(3), 392–395. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434

4. Cankaya, O., & Aydogan, N. (2022). The relationship between argumentation skills and cognitive flexibility of pre-service science teachers. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 8(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v8i2.3963

5. Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3