1. Austen, J. M., Kosaki, Y., & McGregor, A. (2013). Within-compound associations explain potentiation and failure to overshadow learning based on geometry by discrete landmarks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 39, 259–272. doi: 10.1037/a003252
2. Bouton, M. E., Dunlap, C. M., & Swartzentruber, D. (1987). Potentiation of taste by another taste during compound aversion learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 433–438. doi: 10.3758/BF03205053
3. Bouton, M. E., Jones, D. L., McPhillips, S. A., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Potentiation and overshadowing in odor-aversion learning: Role of method of odor presentation, the distal-proximal cue distinction, and the conditionability of odor. Learning and Motivation, 17, 115–138. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(86)90006-8
4. Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149–178. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90041-7
5. Cheung, A., Stürzl, W., Zeil, J., & Cheng, K. (2008). The information content of panoramic images II: View-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental areas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 15–30. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.15