Abstract
AbstractThe original provocative formulation of the ‘geometric module’ hypothesis was based on a working-memory task in rats which suggested that spontaneous reorientation behavior is based solely on the environmental geometry and is impervious to featural cues. Here, we retested that claim by returning to a spontaneous navigation task with rats and domestic chicks, using a single prominent featural cue (a striped wall) within a rectangular arena. Experiments 1 and 2 tested the influence of geometry and features separately. In Experiment 1, we found that both rats and chicks used environmental geometry to compute locations in a plain rectangular arena. In Experiment 2, while chicks failed to spontaneously use a striped wall in a square arena, rats showed a modest influence of the featural cue as a local marker to the goal. The critical third experiment tested the striped wall inside the rectangular arena. We found that although chicks solely relied on geometry, rats navigated based on both environmental geometry and the featural cue. While our findings with rats are contrary to classic claims of an impervious geometric module, they are consistent with the hypothesis that navigation by boundaries and features may involve distinct underlying cognitive computations. We conclude by discussing the similarities and differences in feature-use across tasks and species.
Funder
KAIST
Provincia Autonoma di Trento
Fondazione Cassa Di Risparmio Di Trento E Rovereto
RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Cheng, K. & Gallistel, C. R. Testing the geometric power of an animal’s spatial representation. In “Animal cognition: Proceedings of the Harry Frank Guggenheim conference” (Edited by H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1984).
2. Cheng, K. A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23, 149–178 (1986).
3. Gallistel, C. R. The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (1990).
4. Cheng, K., Huttenlocher, J. & Newcombe, N. S. 25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 1033–1054 (2013).
5. Vallortigara, G. Animals as natural geometers. In “Cognitive Biology: Evolutionary and Developmental Perspectives on Mind, Brain and Behavior” (Edited by L. Tommasi, L. Nadel & M. Peterson). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2009).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献