Motivated for near impossibility: How task type and reward modulate task enjoyment and the striatal activation for extremely difficult task
-
Published:2022-11-30
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:30-41
-
ISSN:1530-7026
-
Container-title:Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci
Author:
Sakaki MichikoORCID, Meliss Stefanie, Murayama KouORCID, Yomogida Yukihito, Matsumori Kaosu, Sugiura Ayaka, Matsumoto Madoka, Matsumoto Kenji
Abstract
AbstractEconomic and decision-making theories suppose that people would disengage from a task with near zero success probability, because this implicates little normative utility values. However, humans often are motivated for an extremely challenging task, even without any extrinsic incentives. The current study aimed to address the nature of this challenge-based motivation and its neural correlates. We found that, when participants played a skill-based task without extrinsic incentives, their task enjoyment increased as the chance of success decreased, even if the task was almost impossible to achieve. However, such challenge-based motivation was not observed when participants were rewarded for the task or the reward was determined in a probabilistic manner. The activation in the ventral striatum/pallidum tracked the pattern of task enjoyment. These results suggest that people are intrinsically motivated to challenge a nearly impossible task but only when the task requires certain skills and extrinsic rewards are unavailable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience
Reference53 articles.
1. Aarts, E., Wallace, D. L., Dang, L. C., Jagust, W., Cools, R., & D'Esposito, M. (2014). Dopamine and the cognitive downside of a promised bonus. Psychological Science, 25, 1003–1009. 2. Baranes, A. F., Oudeyer, P.-Y., & Gottlieb, J. (2014). The effects of task difficulty, novelty and the size of the search space on intrinsically motivated exploration. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 317. 3. Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2013). The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. NeuroImage, 76, 412–427. 4. Boehler, C. N., Hopf, J.-M., Krebs, R. M., Stoppel, C. M., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H.-J., & Noesselt, T. (2011). Task-Load-Dependent Activation of Dopaminergic Midbrain Areas in the Absence of Reward. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4955–4961. 5. Braver, T. S., Krug, M. K., Chiew, K. S., Kool, W., Westbrook, J. A., Clement, N. J., Adcock, R. A., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Carver, C. S., Cools, R., Custers, R., Dickinson, A., Dweck, C. S., Fishbach, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Hess, T. M., Isaacowitz, D. M., Mather, M., … for the MOMCAI group. (2014). Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0300-0
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|