Motivated with joy or anxiety: Does approach-avoidance goal framing elicit differential reward-network activation in the brain?
-
Published:2024-01-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1530-7026
-
Container-title:Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci
Author:
Sakaki MichikoORCID, Murayama Kou, Izuma Keise, Aoki Ryuta, Yomogita Yukihito, Sugiura Ayaka, Singhi Nishad, Matsumoto Madoka, Matsumoto Kenji
Abstract
AbstractPsychological research on human motivation repeatedly observed that approach goals (i.e., goals to attain success) increase task enjoyment and intrinsic motivation more strongly than avoidance goals (i.e., goals to avoid failure). The present study sought to address how the reward network in the brain—including the striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex—is involved when individuals engage in the same task with a focus on approach or avoidance goals. Participants reported stronger positive emotions when they focused on approach goals, but stronger anxiety and disappointment when they focused on avoidance goals. The fMRI analyses revealed that the reward network in the brain showed similar levels of activity to cues predictive of approach and avoidance goals. In contrast, the two goal states were associated with different patterns of activity in the visual cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum during success and failure outcomes. Representation similarity analysis further revealed shared and different representations within the striatum and vmPFC between the approach and avoidance goal states, suggesting both the similarity and uniqueness of the mechanisms behind the two goal states. In addition, the distinct patterns of activation in the striatum were associated with distinct subjective experiences participants reported between the approach and the avoidance conditions. These results suggest the importance of examining the pattern of striatal activity in understanding the mechanisms behind different motivational states in humans.
Funder
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience
Reference68 articles.
1. Aberg, K. C., Doell, K. C., & Schwartz, S. (2015). Hemispheric asymmetries in striatal reward responses relate to approach–avoidance learning and encoding of positive–negative prediction errors in dopaminergic midbrain regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(43), 14491–14500. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1859-15.2015 2. Adcock, R. A., Thangavel, A., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Knutson, B., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2006). Reward-motivated learning: Mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation. Neuron, 50(3), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.036 3. Adrián-Ventura, J., Costumero, V., Parcet, M. A., & Ávila, C. (2019). Reward network connectivity “at rest” is associated with reward sensitivity in healthy adults: A resting-state fMRI study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(3), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00688-1 4. Bach, D. R., Guitart-Masip, M., Packard, P. A., Miró, J., Falip, M., Fuentemilla, L., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Human hippocampus arbitrates approach-avoidance conflict. Current Biology, 24(5), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.046 5. Beaver, J. D., Lawrence, A. D., Ditzhuijzen, J. V., Davis, M. H., Woods, A., & Calder, A. J. (2006). Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(19), 5160–5166. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0350-06.2006
|
|