Examining joint attention with the use of humanoid robots-A new approach to study fundamental mechanisms of social cognition
-
Published:2019-12-17
Issue:2
Volume:27
Page:217-236
-
ISSN:1069-9384
-
Container-title:Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychon Bull Rev
Author:
Chevalier PaulineORCID, Kompatsiari Kyveli, Ciardo Francesca, Wykowska Agnieszka
Abstract
AbstractThis article reviews methods to investigate joint attention and highlights the benefits of new methodological approaches that make use of the most recent technological developments, such as humanoid robots for studying social cognition. After reviewing classical approaches that address joint attention mechanisms with the use of controlled screen-based stimuli, we describe recent accounts that have proposed the need for more natural and interactive experimental protocols. Although the recent approaches allow for more ecological validity, they often face the challenges of experimental control in more natural social interaction protocols. In this context, we propose that the use of humanoid robots in interactive protocols is a particularly promising avenue for targeting the mechanisms of joint attention. Using humanoid robots to interact with humans in naturalistic experimental setups has the advantage of both excellent experimental control and ecological validity. In clinical applications, it offers new techniques for both diagnosis and therapy, especially for children with autism spectrum disorder. The review concludes with indications for future research, in the domains of healthcare applications and human–robot interaction in general.
Funder
Minded Program - Marie Skłodowska-Curie H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference133 articles.
1. Admoni, H., Bank, C., Tan, J., Toneva, M., & Scassellati, B. (2011). Robot gaze does not reflexively cue human attention. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Expanding the space of cognitive science: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1983–1988). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pq1v9b0 2. Admoni, H., & Scassellati, B. (2017). Social eye gaze in human–robot interaction: A review. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 6, 25–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.1.Admoni 3. Akiyama, T., Kato, M., Muramatsu, T., Maeda, T., Hara, T., & Kashima, H. (2008). Gaze-triggered orienting is reduced in chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 158, 287–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2006.12.004 4. Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 267–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01501-1 5. Anzalone, S. M., Tilmont, E., Boucenna, S., Xavier, J., Jouen, A.-L., Bodeau, N., . . . Cohen, D. (2014). How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3D + time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 814–826. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.03.002
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|