1. Allport, A., &Wylie, G. (2000). Selection-for-action in competing (Stroop) tasks: “Task-switching,” stimulusresponse bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Brooks, L. R. (1987). Decentralized control of categorization: The role of prior processing episodes. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and con-ceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 141–174). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 170–178.
4. Clegg, B. A., DiGirolamo, G. J., &Keele, S. W. (1998). Sequence learning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2, 275–281.
5. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., &Milliken, B. (2006). The contextspecific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 316–321.