Evidence against “absolute” scaling-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evidence against “absolute” scaling

Published:1983-11 Issue:6 Volume:33 Page:523-526
ISSN:0031-5117
Container-title:Perception & Psychophysics
language:en
Short-container-title:Perception & Psychophysics

Author:

Mellers Barbara A.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sensory Systems,General Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03202933.pdf

Reference17 articles.

1. Birnbaum, M. H. Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical scales.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 89–96.

2. Birnbaum, M. H. Expectancy and judgment. In F. Restle, R. M. Shiffrin, N. J. Castellan, H. R. Lindman, & D. B. Pisoni (Eds.),Cognitive theory (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.

3. Birnbaum, M. H. Controversies in psychological measurement. In B. Wegner (Ed.),Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1982. (a)

4. ASTM STP773;N. H. Birnbaum,1982

5. Mellers, B. A. Equity judgment: A revision of Aristotelian views.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1982,111, 242–270.

Cited by 87 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is the R-index method for eliciting preference measures from the 9-point hedonic scale fit for purpose?;Food Quality and Preference;2023-01

2. Is the absolute scaling model the basis for the 9-point hedonic scale? Evidence from Poulton’s Stimulus Range Equalizing Bias;Food Quality and Preference;2021-04

3. Unstructured numerical intensity scales: Models, protocols and errors;Food Research International;2021-03

4. The 9-point hedonic scale: Using R-Index Preference Measurement to compute effect size and eliminate artifactual ties;Food Research International;2020-07

5. An empirical category-ratio scale for evaluating the subjective intensity of noise based on the comparison of estimated magnitudes and categories;Applied Acoustics;2020-01