Author:
Arizmendi Cara J.,Bernacki Matthew L.,Raković Mladen,Plumley Robert D.,Urban Christopher J.,Panter A. T.,Greene Jeffrey A.,Gates Kathleen M.
Abstract
AbstractUsing traces of behaviors to predict outcomes is useful in varied contexts ranging from buyer behaviors to behaviors collected from smart-home devices. Increasingly, higher education systems have been using Learning Management System (LMS) digital data to capture and understand students’ learning and well-being. Researchers in the social sciences are increasingly interested in the potential of using digital log data to predict outcomes and design interventions. Using LMS data for predicting the likelihood of students’ success in for-credit college courses provides a useful example of how social scientists can use these techniques on a variety of data types. Here, we provide a primer on how LMS data can be feature-mapped and analyzed to accomplish these goals. We begin with a literature review summarizing current approaches to analyzing LMS data, then discuss ethical issues of privacy when using demographic data and equitable model building. In the second part of the paper, we provide an overview of popular machine learning algorithms and review analytic considerations such as feature generation, assessment of model performance, and sampling techniques. Finally, we conclude with an empirical example demonstrating the ability of LMS data to predict student success, summarizing important features and assessing model performance across different model specifications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference117 articles.
1. Baker, R.S., & Hawn, A. (2021). Algorithmic bias in education. Unpublished.
2. Baker, R.S., Lindrum, D., Lindrum, M.J., & Perkowski, D. (2015) Analyzing early at-risk factors in higher education e-learning courses. Montreal: International Educational Data Mining Society.
3. Baratloo, A., Hosseini, M., Negida, A., & El Ashal, G. (2015). Part 1: simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
4. Barber, R., & Sharkey, M. (2012). Course correction: Using analytics to predict course success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 259–262).
5. Bernacki, M.L. (2018). Examining the cyclical, loosely sequenced, and contingent features of self-regulated learning: Trace data and their analysis.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献