Abstract
AbstractThe quality of tests in psychological and educational assessment is of great scholarly and public interest. Item difficulty models are vital to generating test result interpretations based on evidence. A major determining factor of item difficulty in knowledge tests is the opportunity to learn about the facts and concepts in question. Knowledge is mainly conveyed through language. Exposure to language associated with facts and concepts might be an indicator of the opportunity to learn. Thus, we hypothesize that item difficulty in knowledge tests should be related to the probability of exposure to the item content in everyday life and/or academic settings and therefore also to word frequency. Results from a study with 99 political knowledge test items administered to N = 250 German seventh (age: 11–14 years) and tenth (age: 15–18 years) graders showed that word frequencies in everyday settings (SUBTLEX-DE) explain variance in item difficulty, while word frequencies in academic settings (dlexDB) alone do not. However, both types of word frequency combined explain a considerable amount of the variance in item difficulty. Items with words that are more frequent in both settings and, in particular, relatively frequent in everyday settings are easier. High word frequencies and relatively higher word frequency in everyday settings could be associated with higher probability of exposure, conceptual complexity, and better readability of item content. Examining word frequency from different language settings can help researchers investigate test score interpretations and is a useful tool for predicting item difficulty and refining knowledge test items.
Funder
Technische Universität Dortmund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference59 articles.
1. Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G., & Samson, A. (2015). Variance inflation factor: as a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable (s) in regression analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 5(7), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075
2. Alscher, P., Ludewig, U., & McElvany, N. (2022). Civic Literacy – zur Theorie und Messbarkeit eines Kompetenzmodells für die schulische politische Bildung [Civic Literacy - on the Theory and Measurability of a Competence Model for Civic Education in Schools]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft [Journal of Educational Science], 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-022-01085-0
3. American Psychological Association, APA Task Force on Psychological Assessment
and Evaluation Guidelines. (2020). APA guidelines for psychological assessment and
evaluation. Retrieved from www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-psychologicalassessment-evaluation.pdf
4. Benoit, K., Muhr, D., & Watanabe, K. (2021). stopwords: Multilingual Stopword Lists. R package version 2.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stopwords
5. Berendes, K., Vajjala, S., Meurers, D., Bryant, D., Wagner, W., Chinkina, M., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Reading demands in secondary school: Does the linguistic complexity of textbooks increase with grade level and the academic orientation of the school track? Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 518–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000225
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献