Abstract
AbstractRemembering an experienced event in a coherent manner requires the binding of the event’s constituent elements. Such binding effects manifest as a stochastic dependency of the retrieval of event elements. Several approaches for modeling these dependencies have been proposed. We compare the contingency-based approach by Horner & Burgess (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1370–1383, 2013), related approaches using Yule’s Q (Yule, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75(6), 579–652, 1912) or an adjusted Yule’s Q (c.f. Horner & Burgess, Current Biology, 24(9), 988–992, 2014), an approach based on item response theory (IRT, Schreiner et al., in press), and a nonparametric variant of the IRT-based approach. We present evidence from a simulation study comparing the five approaches regarding their empirical detection rates and susceptibility to different levels of memory performance, and from an empirical application. We found the IRT-based approach and its nonparametric variant to yield the highest power for detecting dependencies or differences in dependency between conditions. However, the nonparametric variant yielded increasing Type I error rates with increasing dependency in the data when testing for differences in dependency. We found the approaches based on Yule’s Q to yield biased estimates and to be strongly affected by memory performance. The other measures were unbiased given no dependency or differences in dependency but were also affected by memory performance if there was dependency in the data or if there were differences in dependency, but to a smaller extent. The results suggest that the IRT-based approach is best suited for measuring binding effects. Further considerations when deciding for a modeling approach are discussed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference59 articles.
1. Andermane, N., Joensen, B. H., & Horner, A.J (2021). Forgetting across a hierarchy of episodic representations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 67, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.08.004
2. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02293814
3. Arnold, N. R., Heck, D. W., Bröder, A., Meiser, T., & Boywitt, C.D. (2019). Testing hypotheses about binding in context memory with a hierarchical multinomial modeling approach: A preregistered study. Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000442
4. Balaban, H., Assaf, D., Arad Meir, M., & Luria, R. (2019). Different features of real-world objects are represented in a dependent manner in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(7). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000716
5. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F.M. Lord, & M.R. Novick (Eds.) Statistical theories of mental test scores: Addison-Wesley.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献