Critical Evaluation of Published Research: Some Guidelines

Author:

Harber Jean R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Special Education, School Psychology and Communication Disorders, Indiana State University

Abstract

Studies of the quality of published educational research have indicated that, while the quality is improving, much published research still suffers from major weaknesses. This finding is particularly disconcerting since it is generally recognized that the average reader of educational journals lacks a sound understanding of the research process and of statistics and is, therefore, very likely to accept uncritically as true anything reported in the published literature. This article suggests ways in which the consumer of educational research can critically evaluate research reports in terms of sample and methodology, design and statistical treatment, and results and interpretation. The reader is alerted to sources of deliberate and nondeliberate bias and to fallacious use and/or interpretation of statistics. The reader of educational research must critically evaluate research in order to determine whether totally or partially to accept, or to question or reject reported findings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Health Professions,Education

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Psychosocial Correlates of Learning Disabilities;Handbook of Psychosocial Characteristics of Exceptional Children;1999

2. Psychosocial Characteristics of Learning Disabled Students;Learning Disabilities;1992

3. The Use of Schema in Research on the Problem Solving of Learning Disabled Adolescents;Intervention Research in Learning Disabilities;1990

4. Competencies for Teachers of Students with Learning Disabilities;Journal of Learning Disabilities;1987-04

5. Minimum Standards for the Description of Subjects in Learning Disabilities Research Reports;Learning Disability Quarterly;1984-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3