How Replicable is Current LD Research? A Follow-Up to the CLD Research Committee's Recommendations-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How Replicable is Current LD Research? A Follow-Up to the CLD Research Committee's Recommendations

Published:1989-08 Issue:3 Volume:12 Page:174-179
ISSN:0731-9487
Container-title:Learning Disability Quarterly
language:en
Short-container-title:Learning Disability Quarterly

Author:

Hammill Donald D.¹,Bryant Brian R.¹,Brown Linda²,Dunn Caroline³,Marten Al⁴

Affiliation:

1. PRO-ED, Inc., Austin, TX

2. Austin, TX

3. The University of Texas

4. Technical Assistance, Texas Education Agency

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which published research articles in the field of learning disabilities are replicable. To be replicable, the characteristics of a study's sample must be described in detail. In 1984, the Research Committee of the Council for Learning Disabilities recommended that researchers describe their sample by reporting subject data in seven areas. Research articles published in 10 major journals during the years 1984–1987 were evaluated to determine how many satisfied the recommendations. Only 4 of the 277 articles we reviewed included acceptable information on all seven areas. As a result, we must conclude that a replicable body of learning disabilities research does not exist for the period studied.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Health Professions,Education

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2307/1510686

Reference9 articles.

1. Subject Description and Generality of Results in Experiments with Aphasic Adults

2. The Bannatyne Recategorization Assessment Procedure: Is it Valid for Individual Diagnosis of LD Children?

3. Partner Age as a Variable in the Conversational Performance of Specifically Language-Impaired and Normal-Language Children

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reporting of demographic variables in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis;Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis;2020-05-07

2. Learning Disability Identification Criteria and Reporting in Empirical Research: A Review of 2001-2013;Learning Disabilities Research & Practice;2016-09-26

3. A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models;Remedial and Special Education;2014-02-06

4. Dyslexia Marker Variables;Remedial and Special Education;1998-09

5. Minimum Standards for the Description of Participants in Learning Disabilities Research;Remedial and Special Education;1994-01