Four-year follow-up on a gynecologic laparoscopic skills curriculum and discussion of its implementation

Author:

Dose NynneORCID,Sørensen Jette LedORCID,Strandbygaard Jeanett

Abstract

Introduction Simulation-based training of surgical skills is transferable to the operating room, but implementation of a specific skills curricula is still challenging. Ongoing efforts serve to identify and implement the optimal curriculum for ensuring patient safety. In 2013 the validated ‘basic laparoscopic skills curriculum’ was introduced for first-year residents in obstetrics and gynecology in Eastern Denmark. The aim of this study was to follow-up on implementation of the curriculum through a four-year period and identify facilitators and barriers. Material and method The ‘basic laparoscopic skills curriculum’ comprises four steps encompassing theoretical education (step 1 & 2) , proficiency-based technical skills training on virtual reality simulators (step 3), and a one-day surgical course with participants practicing procedures on sedated pigs (step 4) . All participants were first-year residents in obstetrics and gynecology in Eastern Denmark from September 2014 to August 2018. The ‘basic laparoscopic skills curriculum’ was administered by the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES). Dropouts were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire on why they did not finish the curriculum. Results During the four-year follow-up, 107 first-year residents participated in the curriculum. One-hundred completed step three (93%) and 99 (92.5%) step 4. Participants spent a median of 249, IQR 164 minutes (min. 64, max. 630) on the virtual reality simulator. Median time for completing all four steps of the curriculum was 56 days, IQR 98 (min. 14, max 253). Conclusions Completion rates were continuously high over four years in this basic laparoscopic skills curriculum for residents. One likely reason is that the curriculum was partially mandatory, combined with a supportive management that allotted participation time. Self-directed learning, self-study and flexible booking are also considered as playing a crucial role.

Publisher

Danish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3