Examining connections between screening for breast, cervical and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer screening-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Examining connections between screening for breast, cervical and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer screening

Published:2014-06 Issue:3 Volume:3 Page:253-263
ISSN:1758-194X
Container-title:Colorectal Cancer
language:en
Short-container-title:Colorectal Cancer

Author:

Wirth Michael D¹,Brandt Heather M¹²,Dolinger Heather²³,Hardin James W⁴,Sharpe Patricia A⁵⁶,Eberth Jan M¹⁴

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Prevention & Control Program, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

2. Department of Health Promotion, Education, & Behavior, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200 Columbia, SC 29208, USA

3. American Cancer Society, Inc., 128 Stonemark Lane, Columbia, SC, USA

4. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

5. Prevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street Room 124, Columbia, SC 29208, USA

6. Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street Room 124, Columbia, SC 29208 USA

Abstract

SUMMARY Aim: To compare participation in breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Materials & methods: This random digit-dialed survey includes participants (aged 50–75 years) from South Carolina (USA). Past participation information in fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, mammography, clinical breast examination, Pap test, prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination was obtained.Adjusted odds ratios are reported. Results: Among European–American women, any cervical or breast cancer screening was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Among African–American women, mammography was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests were associated with adherence to any CRC screening test among all men. Conclusion: Future research should explore approaches inclusive of cancer screening recommendations for multiple cancer types for reduction of cancer screening disparities.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Gastroenterology,Oncology

Link

https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/pdf/10.2217/crc.14.18

Reference64 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2013

2. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

3. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013

4. Relationship of colorectal cancer awareness and knowledge with colorectal cancer screening

5. Screening Adherence for Colorectal Cancer Among Immigrant Hispanic Women

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prostate Specific Antigen Screening on a Nationwide Level: Featuring the Contribution of Race and Life Expectancy in Decision Making;Clinical Genitourinary Cancer;2023-11

2. Participation in breast cancer screening and its influence on other cancer screening invitations: study in women aged 56 years old in four French departments;European Journal of Cancer Prevention;2023-02-13

3. Concurrent participation in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes in Denmark: A nationwide registry-based study;Preventive Medicine;2023-02

4. Effect of Patient Characteristics on Uptake of Screening Using a Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kit;JAMA Network Open;2022-11-30

5. Sociodemographic correlates of colorectal cancer screening completion among women adherent to mammography screening guidelines by place of birth;BMC Women's Health;2022-04-21