Role of practice-based research networks in comparative effectiveness research

Author:

Hartung Daniel M1,Guise Jeanne-Marie2,Fagnan Lyle J2,Davis Melinda M2,Stange Kurt C3

Affiliation:

1. Oregon State University/Oregon Health & Science University College of Pharmacy, 3303 SW Bond Avenue, CH12C, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

2. Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA

3. Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, USA

Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research fundamentally reorients how clinical evidence is generated and used with the goal of providing actionable information to decision-makers. To achieve this, it is vital that decision-makers and the research enterprise are engaged from research inception, to evidence generation and translation. Practice-based research networks are affiliated clinicians in diverse communities with the goal of conducting research to improve care. Practice-based research networks have the potential to advance all phases of the comparative effectiveness research cycle. The aim of this paper is to explore current and potential roles of practice-based research networks in conducting comparative effectiveness research.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Health Policy

Reference38 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.Learning What Works Best: the Nation’s Need for Evidence on Comparative Effectiveness in Healthcare. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, DC, USA (2007).

2. Small Area Variations in Health Care Delivery

3. Congressional Budget Office.Research on the Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Treatments. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC, USA (2007).

4. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.Report to the President and Congress. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA (2009).

5. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA (2009).

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3