Analysis of pain symptoms, flexibility and hydroxyproline concentration in individuals with low back pain submitted to Global Postural Re-education and stretching-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Analysis of pain symptoms, flexibility and hydroxyproline concentration in individuals with low back pain submitted to Global Postural Re-education and stretching

Published:2020-05 Issue:3 Volume:10 Page:167-177
ISSN:1758-1869
Container-title:Pain Management
language:en
Short-container-title:Pain Management

Author:

Matos Frederico Pecorone¹^ORCID,Dantas Estélio Henrique Martin²³^ORCID,de Oliveira Flávio Boechat¹⁴⁵^ORCID,de Castro Juliana Brandão Pinto⁴⁵^ORCID,Conceição Mario Cezar de S Costa⁴⁵^ORCID,Nunes Rodolfo de Alkmim Moreira⁴⁵^ORCID,Vale Rodrigo Gomes de Souza¹⁴⁵⁶^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Estácio de Sá University, Cabo Frio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2. Laboratory of Biosciences of Human Motricity, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

3. Postgraduate Program in Health & Environment, Tiradentes University, Aracaju, Brazil

4. Postgraduate Program in Exercise & Sport Sciences, Institute of Physical Education & Sports, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

5. Laboratory of Exercise & Sport, Institute of Physical Education & Sports, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

6. Productivity Research Fellow, Estácio de Sá University, Cabo Frio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate pain, flexibility and hydroxyproline (HP) urinary levels in patients with nonspecific low back pain submitted to Global Postural Re-education (GPR) and stretching. Materials & methods: 39 individuals who reported low back pain were randomly assigned to a group submitted to GPR (GPRG) or stretching exercises (SG) for 8 weeks. Pain and flexibility were assessed using the Borg CR10 scale and goniometry, respectively. Results: The GPR group showed a significant reduction in the HP levels and significant improvements in flexibility after the intervention when compared with SG. Both groups presented a significant reduction in HP and pain after the intervention. Conclusion: Both interventions were effective in the treatment of low back pain. However, the GPR method presented better responses than stretching.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/pdf/10.2217/pmt-2019-0053

Reference45 articles.

1. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

2. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a systematic review of individual and community-based burden of spinal disorders in rural populations in low- and middle-income communities

3. Management of low back pain

4. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain

5. Exercise Therapy for Office Workers With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effects of FIFA 11+ program on speed, body balance and leg muscle power to prevent injury among football club university player;Fizjoterapia Polska;2023-06-24

2. The Mézières Method as a Novel Treatment for Elite Spanish Second-Division Soccer League Players With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial;Journal of Sport Rehabilitation;2022-05-01

3. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2021-09-28

4. Acute Effects of Global Postural Re-Education on Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Does Time-of-Day Play a Role?;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2021-01-15