The problem of the web: Can we prioritize both participatory practices and privacy?

Author:

Stewart Bonnie E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, CANADA

Abstract

This paper is a critical case study tracing the professional history of a self-professed open educator over more than two decades. It frames the narrative of an individual as a window on the broader arc of the field, from early open learning as a means of widening participation, through the rise of the participatory web at scale, to the current datafied and extractive infrastructure of higher education. It outlines how the field of online education has changed, as the web and the social and societal forces shaping use of the web have shifted. Through these lenses of change, the case study explores the dilemma facing open and participatory education at this juncture: that the current structure of the web threatens privacy, higher education governance structures, and the spirit of open, participatory sharing. The paper explores the problem of the web as one without direct solutions but does consider ways that educators might mitigate their open practice in more critical directions.

Publisher

Bastas Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Education

Reference53 articles.

1. Anderson, T. (2009). Open scholarship [Paper presentation]. Open Access Week 2009, Athabasca University.

2. Bali, M. (2016). Knowing the difference between digital skills and digital literacies, and teaching both. Literacy Now. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/blog/literacy-now/2016/02/03/knowing-the-difference-between-digital-skills-and-digital-literacies-and-teaching-both

3. Bali, M. (2017). Curation of posts on open pedagogy. https://blog.mahabali.me/whyopen/curation-of-posts-on-open-pedagogy-yearofopen

4. Bates, T. (2022). The perversion of the Internet: Scraping and selling children’s data from ed tech tools. https://www.tonybates.ca/2022/05/29/the-perversion-of-the-internet-scraping-and-selling-childrens-data-from-ed-tech-tools/

5. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3