Exploring the Safe Harbor Principle and the Allocation of Platform Liability in the DMCA

Author:

Wang Peixuan

Abstract

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act's safe harbor clauses, which was established more than 20 years ago, are no longer able to reconcile the current widespread problem of copyright infringement in social media. Therefore, this paper examines the allocation of responsibilities between social media platforms, users and copyright owners in the event of digital copyright infringement in social media, the negative impact of the DMCA provisions on stakeholders in social media and possible solutions to the problem. The main problem with the current DMCA's safe harbor doctrine is that the exemptions provided shift too much responsibility and liability to copyright owners and social media users, fail to provide effective remedies, and place an extremely heavy burden on them to enforce their rights. This has had a negative impact on the development of social media and creative output. For this reason, Congress need to change the DMCA's upregulating to increase the bar for safe harbor designation and impose additional requirements on platforms. In order to more effectively contribute to the growth of the social media business and the preservation of digital copyright pairs in the field of practice, this study primarily adopts a legal doctrinal research technique, comparative research approach, and literary research method.

Publisher

Boya Century Publishing

Reference15 articles.

1. Congressional Research Service. Safe Harbor for Online Service Providers Under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act [EB/OL]. https://crsreports.congress.gov R43436, 2022/9/16.

2. Belleville M. IP wars: SOPA, PIPA, and the fight over online piracy[J]. Temp. Int'l & Comp. LJ, 2012, 26: 303.

3. Koberidze M. The DMCA Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail or Safe[J]. Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, 2015, 11 (1): 211.

4. Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix [J]. Business Horizons, 2009, 52 (4): 357 - 365.

5. Ward A M. The "Viacom v YouTube" Litigation and Section 512 (c) DMCA: When the Safe Harbor Becomes a Permanent Mooring[M]//Google and the Law. TMC Asser Press, 2012: 203 - 238.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3