Abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 has stressed healthcare systems and workers worldwide. GPs, as first points of contact between suspected cases and the healthcare system, have assumed frontline roles in this crisis. While the prevalence of mental health problems and illnesses arising in healthcare workers (HCWs) from tertiary care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic is well-examined,1 the impact on GPs remains understudied.AimTo describe the prevalence and predictors of anxiety, burnout, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design & settingSurvey of GPs operating in Singapore primary care clinics.MethodGPs completed a survey that comprised of four validated psychometric instruments. Open-ended questions asked about responders’ challenges and their envisaged support. Data were analysed with multiple logistic regression with demographic data as covariates; concepts of grounded theory were used to analyse the qualitative responses.ResultsA total of 257 GPs participated. Fifty-five (21.4%) met the scales’ criteria for anxiety, 211 (82.1%) for burnout, 68 (26.6%) for depression, and 23 (8.9%) for PTSD. Multivariate regression analysis showed working in a public primary care setting was associated with anxiety and depression. Qualitative analyses uncovered possible stressors: changes to clinical and operational practices; increased workloads; and financial difficulties.ConclusionMental health issues were found to be present in Singaporean GPs during the pandemic. Prevalence of anxiety, burnout, and depression were found to be higher than those reported pre-COVID-19. The findings also provide determinants of the issues that serve as possible foci for targeted interventions.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference67 articles.
1. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2. World Health Organization (2020) WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard (WHO, Geneva).
3. Public Health England (2020) [Withdrawn] COVID-19: interim guidance for primary care (PHE, London).
4. National Academy of Medicine, Secretariat (2016) The neglected dimension of global security: a framework to counter infectious disease crises (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC). https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21891/the-neglected-dimension-of-global-security-a-framework-to-counter.
5. Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19): a guide for UK GPs
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献