Safety netting for primary care: evidence from a literature review

Author:

Jones Daniel,Dunn Laurie,Watt Ian,Macleod Una

Abstract

BackgroundEnsuring patient safety is vital in primary care. One mechanism to increase patient safety is through a practice known as safety netting. Safety netting is widely recommended in national guidelines; however, a variety of definitions exist with no consensus on when safety netting should be used and what advice or actions it should contain.AimThis study aimed to identify different definitions of safety netting to provide conceptual clarity and propose a common approach to safety netting in primary care.Design and settingLiterature review and evidence synthesis of international articles relating to safety netting in primary care.MethodAn electronic database and grey-literature search was conducted using terms around the theme of safety netting with broad inclusion criteria.ResultsA total of 47 studies were included in the review. Safety netting was defined as a consultation technique to communicate uncertainty, provide patient information on red-flag symptoms, and plan for future appointments to ensure timely re-assessment of a patient’s condition. Safety-netting advice may include information on the natural history of the illness, advice on worrying symptoms to look out for, and specific information on how and when to seek help. In addition to advice within the consultation, safety netting includes follow-up of investigations and hospital referrals. Safety netting was considered to be particularly important when consulting with children, the acutely unwell, patients with multimorbidity, and those with mental health problems.ConclusionSafety netting is more than solely the communication of uncertainty within a consultation. It should include plans for follow-up as well as important administrative aspects, such as the communication of test results and management of hospital letters.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference58 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/∼/media/Files/Report%20Files/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm/Quality%20Chasm%202001%20%20report%20brief.pdf (accessed 30 Oct 2018).

2. An international language for patient safety: Global progress in patient safety requires classification of key concepts

3. Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: A prospective observational study

4. Health Foundation (2011) Levels of harm in primary care (London) https://www.health.org.uk/publication/levels-harm-primary-care (accessed 30 Oct 2018).

5. Cancer Research UK (2016) Safety netting. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/learning-and-development-tools/safety-netting#Safety_netting1 (accessed 30 Oct 2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3