Abstract
ObjectivesTo codesign safety-netting strategies for primary and emergency care settings by integrating the experiences and ideas of patients, carers and clinicians.DesignA codesign process involving two focus group discussions, eight individual interviews and five workshops. All sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and reported using the Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines.SettingPrimary and emergency care in Sweden, focusing on the Stockholm region.Participants7 (5 women) individuals with patient expertise, 1 (man) individual with carer expertise, 18 (12 women) individuals with clinical expertise.ResultsThree main categories reflecting strategies for applying safety-netting were developed: first,conveying safety-netting advice, which involves understanding patient concerns, tailoring communication and using appropriate modalities for communicating; second,ensuring common understanding,which involves summarising information, asking a teach-back question and anticipating questions post consultation; and third,supporting safety-netting behaviour,which involves facilitating reconsultation, helping patients and carers to navigate the health system and explaining the care context and its purpose.ConclusionsOur study highlights the collaborative nature of safety-netting, engaging both the clinician and patient, sometimes supported by carers, in an iterative process. Adding to previous research, our study also emphasises the importance of anticipating postconsultation inquiries and facilitating reconsultation.
Reference36 articles.
1. Diagnostic errors reported in primary healthcare and emergency departments: A retrospective and descriptive cohort study of 4830 reported cases of preventable harm in Sweden
2. The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care
3. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine . Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/21794
4. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations
5. Communication failure: basic components, contributing factors, and the call for structure;Dayton;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2007