Primary care blood tests before cancer diagnosis: National Cancer Diagnosis Audit data

Author:

Cranfield Ben MORCID,Koo Minjoung MonicaORCID,Abel Gary AORCID,Swann RuthORCID,McPhail Sean,Rubin Greg PORCID,Lyratzopoulos GeorgiosORCID

Abstract

BackgroundBlood tests can support the diagnostic process in patients with cancer but how often they are used is unclear.AimTo explore use of common blood tests before cancer diagnosis in primary care.Design and settingEnglish National Cancer Diagnosis Audit data on 39 752 patients with cancer diagnosed in 2018.MethodCommon blood test use (full blood count [FBC], urea and electrolytes [U&E], and liver function tests [LFTs]), variation by patient and symptom group, and associations with the primary care interval and the diagnostic interval were assessed.ResultsAt least one common blood test was used in 41% (n= 16 427/39 752) of patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Among tested patients, (n= 16 427), FBC was used in 95% (n= 15 540), U&E in 89% (n= 14 555), and LFTs in 76% (n= 12 414). Blood testing was less common in females (adjusted odds ratio versus males: 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 0.98) and Black and minority ethnic patients (0.89, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.97 versus White), and more common in older patients (1.12, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.18 for ≥70 years versus 50–69 years). Test use varied greatly by cancer site (melanoma 2% [n= 55/2297]; leukaemia 84% [n= 552/661]). Fewer patients presenting with alarm symptoms alone were tested (24% [n= 3341/13 778]) than those with non-alarm symptoms alone (50% [n= 8223/16 487]). Median primary care interval and diagnostic interval were longer in tested than non-tested patients (primary care interval: 10 versus 0 days; diagnostic interval: 49 versus 32 days, respectively,P<0.001 for both), including among tested patients with alarm symptoms (primary care interval: 4 versus 0 days; diagnostic interval: 41 versus 22 days).ConclusionTwo-fifths of patients subsequently diagnosed with cancer have primary care blood tests as part of their diagnostic process. Given variable test use, research is needed on the clinical context in which blood tests are ordered.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3